<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Farewell to The Independent</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bja.igloo1.com/blog/farewell-to-the-independent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bja.igloo1.com/blog/farewell-to-the-independent/</link>
	<description>from BJ&#38;A</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 12:01:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sommers</title>
		<link>https://bja.igloo1.com/blog/farewell-to-the-independent/#comment-127871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Sommers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 10:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bjanda.com/blog/?p=725#comment-127871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NOTHING that tries to reproduce itself in an on-line version makes much money; even Amazon which was born online makes very little from its retailing businesses. We&#039;re welcoming in these new paradigms which destroy our existing business models all over the place, but a) they don&#039;t make enough money to survive once their share price bubble bursts and b) more importantly, they often don&#039;t adequately replace the thing they outmode, especially in the case of newspapers.
As another old fogey (admittedly) it seems to me that the reading of a newspaper has not been principally about getting &quot;news&quot; for decades. It&#039;s a leisure occupation which informs, fleshes out such information and entertains through a largely serendipitous mix of subjects appealing to a target socio demographic. Given the circumstances of the reader&#039;s attention, all on-line incarnations seem eventually reduced to recycling click bait in order to generate saleable statistics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOTHING that tries to reproduce itself in an on-line version makes much money; even Amazon which was born online makes very little from its retailing businesses. We&#8217;re welcoming in these new paradigms which destroy our existing business models all over the place, but a) they don&#8217;t make enough money to survive once their share price bubble bursts and b) more importantly, they often don&#8217;t adequately replace the thing they outmode, especially in the case of newspapers.<br />
As another old fogey (admittedly) it seems to me that the reading of a newspaper has not been principally about getting &#8220;news&#8221; for decades. It&#8217;s a leisure occupation which informs, fleshes out such information and entertains through a largely serendipitous mix of subjects appealing to a target socio demographic. Given the circumstances of the reader&#8217;s attention, all on-line incarnations seem eventually reduced to recycling click bait in order to generate saleable statistics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey</title>
		<link>https://bja.igloo1.com/blog/farewell-to-the-independent/#comment-127833</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 09:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bjanda.com/blog/?p=725#comment-127833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with moving online is that advertisers love a full page newspaper ad but do not want to buy crappy banners...so how will digital news make money? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with moving online is that advertisers love a full page newspaper ad but do not want to buy crappy banners&#8230;so how will digital news make money? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
