<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just Because We Can&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bja.igloo1.com/blog/just-because-we-can/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bja.igloo1.com/blog/just-because-we-can/</link>
	<description>from BJ&#38;A</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 12:01:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rupert Staines</title>
		<link>https://bja.igloo1.com/blog/just-because-we-can/#comment-127433</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rupert Staines]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 13:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bjanda.com/blog/?p=704#comment-127433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Humans need to communicate with each other more and advertising has only ever been a signpost in that conversation....and frankly it should remain as such. The best digital can offer is to curate this better.....which, by the way, I think it is improving on especially as most media gets shunted into a digital lane.
Google - well, too big to fail?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Humans need to communicate with each other more and advertising has only ever been a signpost in that conversation&#8230;.and frankly it should remain as such. The best digital can offer is to curate this better&#8230;..which, by the way, I think it is improving on especially as most media gets shunted into a digital lane.<br />
Google &#8211; well, too big to fail?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue Elms</title>
		<link>https://bja.igloo1.com/blog/just-because-we-can/#comment-127342</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sue Elms]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bjanda.com/blog/?p=704#comment-127342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Totally agree.

In the vast amount of stuff I get thrown at me, your blogs are not just something I am &quot;open&quot; to skimming, but something I look forward to getting like a nice magazine subscription.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree.</p>
<p>In the vast amount of stuff I get thrown at me, your blogs are not just something I am &#8220;open&#8221; to skimming, but something I look forward to getting like a nice magazine subscription.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob hoffman</title>
		<link>https://bja.igloo1.com/blog/just-because-we-can/#comment-127336</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bob hoffman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bjanda.com/blog/?p=704#comment-127336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The issue of &quot;brand&quot; is a complicated one. 

Brand &quot;loyalty&quot; is certainly one of the most mischaracterized of all consumer behaviors. It usually turns out to be nothing more than convenience, habit, or mild satisfaction. Not the &quot;love&quot; that brand babblers like to chatter about.

On the other hand, brand awareness and brand preference are enormously powerful drivers of consumer behavior. If the Google genius doubts this, let&#039;s see him take the Google brand off his website and see what happens.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue of &#8220;brand&#8221; is a complicated one. </p>
<p>Brand &#8220;loyalty&#8221; is certainly one of the most mischaracterized of all consumer behaviors. It usually turns out to be nothing more than convenience, habit, or mild satisfaction. Not the &#8220;love&#8221; that brand babblers like to chatter about.</p>
<p>On the other hand, brand awareness and brand preference are enormously powerful drivers of consumer behavior. If the Google genius doubts this, let&#8217;s see him take the Google brand off his website and see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Grubbs</title>
		<link>https://bja.igloo1.com/blog/just-because-we-can/#comment-127333</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Grubbs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bjanda.com/blog/?p=704#comment-127333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another thoughtful and observant piece, Brian.  Unbelievable comment from Google rep... thought they only hired the smartest guy in the room.  Oh, sorry, that was Enron.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thoughtful and observant piece, Brian.  Unbelievable comment from Google rep&#8230; thought they only hired the smartest guy in the room.  Oh, sorry, that was Enron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bedwell</title>
		<link>https://bja.igloo1.com/blog/just-because-we-can/#comment-127332</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Bedwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 13:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bjanda.com/blog/?p=704#comment-127332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m beginning to wonder whether Brian should actually be allowed to walk the streets on his own. As for talking to strangers....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m beginning to wonder whether Brian should actually be allowed to walk the streets on his own. As for talking to strangers&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques Lehodey</title>
		<link>https://bja.igloo1.com/blog/just-because-we-can/#comment-127331</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacques Lehodey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 12:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bjanda.com/blog/?p=704#comment-127331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How dare you question the New York Times.  The are ALWAYS right.  For example, they fully supported the position that the US needed to go to IRAK because they had WMDs. Need I say more?  The reality is that the advertising trade was the coolest and that only pros could comment on it.  Now that Digital is the coolest,no one can comment on that but everyone is giving their (unsolicited)opinion on advertising.  Including the NYT.  The Mad men industry (not culture which is misogynistic and self destructive)is long gone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How dare you question the New York Times.  The are ALWAYS right.  For example, they fully supported the position that the US needed to go to IRAK because they had WMDs. Need I say more?  The reality is that the advertising trade was the coolest and that only pros could comment on it.  Now that Digital is the coolest,no one can comment on that but everyone is giving their (unsolicited)opinion on advertising.  Including the NYT.  The Mad men industry (not culture which is misogynistic and self destructive)is long gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Moseley</title>
		<link>https://bja.igloo1.com/blog/just-because-we-can/#comment-127330</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Moseley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 10:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bjanda.com/blog/?p=704#comment-127330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brilliantly put, I couldn&#039;t agree more!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliantly put, I couldn&#8217;t agree more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
