<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Transparency Isn’t a Passing Fad</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bja.igloo1.com/blog/why-transparency-isnt-a-passing-fad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bja.igloo1.com/blog/why-transparency-isnt-a-passing-fad/</link>
	<description>from BJ&#38;A</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 12:01:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bedwell</title>
		<link>https://bja.igloo1.com/blog/why-transparency-isnt-a-passing-fad/#comment-68804</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Bedwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bjanda.com/blog/?p=474#comment-68804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surely the whole point of a buying review, no matter how pleased you were with the results, is to ascertain whether or not you could have achieved the same results for less expenditure or maybe more for the same. Without transparency that cannot be assessed and a client should assume that he might even have achieved more for less. Guilty until proved innocent might be the assumption!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely the whole point of a buying review, no matter how pleased you were with the results, is to ascertain whether or not you could have achieved the same results for less expenditure or maybe more for the same. Without transparency that cannot be assessed and a client should assume that he might even have achieved more for less. Guilty until proved innocent might be the assumption!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
